4.7 Article

Friction and wear properties of aligned carbon nanotubes reinforced epoxy composites under water lubricated condition

期刊

WEAR
卷 308, 期 1-2, 页码 105-112

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2013.10.007

关键词

Polymer-matrix composite; Aligned carbon nanotubes; Epoxy resin; Boundary lubrication; Friction and wear

资金

  1. National Young Top Talents Plan of China
  2. National Science Foundation of China [50903010, 51175066]
  3. FANEDD [201164]
  4. New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0704]
  5. Provincial New Century Excellent Talent [1251-NCET-007]
  6. National Doctor Foundation [20110490114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel continuously aligned carbon nanotubes (ACNTs) were synthesized by a floating catalyst Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) process. The ACNTs reinforced epoxy (EP) composites were prepared by a capillary-induced moistening method. The tribological properties of pure EP and ACNTs/EP composites in water were comparatively investigated in terms of loads and velocities. Results indicated that both the wear rate and the friction coefficient of ACNTs/EP composites were lower than those of pure EP. ACNTs/EP composites displayed outstanding anti-wear properties, which reduced the wear rate by 219 times as compared to pure EP. Superior performances of ACNTs/EP composites were also observed in rigorous condition (4.0 MPa). The worn and counterpart surfaces were studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). SEM observations revealed a slightly abrasive wear behavior for ACNTs/EP composites, while fatigue and abrasive wear behavior for pure EP. In particular, owing to the obstruction of ACNTs tips, part of the debris of epoxy adhered to the worn surface of ACNTs/EP composites. This debris reinsertion behavior further improved the wear resistance of ACNTs/EP composites. Besides, the effect of water on the tribological behaviors of ACNTs/EP composites was discussed as well. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据