4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The influence of carbide dissolution on the erosion-corrosion properties of cast tungsten carbide/Ni-based PTAW overlays

期刊

WEAR
卷 271, 期 9-10, 页码 1314-1324

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2011.01.046

关键词

Erosion-corrosion; Erosion; Corrosion; WC overlays; Oil sands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

WC/Ni-based plasma transfer arc welded (PTAW) overlays are frequently used in the oil sands industry for applications requiring extremely high wear resistance. These overlays usually consist of a dense distribution of either tungsten monocarbide (WC) or cast tungsten carbides (WC/W(2)C) in a NiBSi or NiCrBSi matrix. A previous erosion-corrosion (E-C) study of cast tungsten carbide/NiBSi-based PTAW overlays not only highlighted the expected preferential E-C attack of the non Cr-bearing matrix but also the significantly greater effect that carbide dissolution of the cast tungsten carbides had on the overall E-C performance of the overlay. It is recognised that cast tungsten carbide particles are more susceptible to dissolution during deposition than WC. As a result, a new process that modifies the outer periphery of cast tungsten carbides by producing a tungsten monocarbide shell has been developed. Overlays consisting of these carbides in a NiBSi binder were subsequently produced with the aim of reducing the extent of dissolution during deposition. The aims of this study were (i) to assess the effectiveness of the tungsten monocarbide outer shell of cast tungsten carbides to resist dissolution during the PTAW deposition process; and (ii) to highlight any improvements in the E-C properties using a novel slurry pot erosion corrosion (SPEC) tester, which incorporates a three-electrode cell to enable the separate components of erosion, corrosion and synergy, to be established. Results were compared with a commercially available NiBSi PTAW overlay containing unmodified cast tungsten carbides. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据