4.0 Article

Factors Influencing Snowy Plover Nest Survival on Ocean-Fronting Beaches in Coastal Northern California

期刊

WATERBIRDS
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 503-511

出版社

WATERBIRD SOC
DOI: 10.1675/063.035.0401

关键词

California; Charadrius nivosus; Common Raven; nest predation; nest success; nest survival; shorebird; Snowy Plover

资金

  1. California Department of Fish and Game
  2. California Department of Parks and Recreation
  3. Chevron Oil Corporation
  4. Humboldt State University
  5. Mad River Biologists
  6. MRB Research Inc.
  7. U.S. Bureau of Land Management
  8. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Game's Oil Spill Response Trust Fund
  9. School of Veterinary Medicine
  10. University of California

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selection of a nest site that affords camouflage of eggs or incubating adults is thought to be strongly influenced by predation, especially for ground-nesting birds. Data from 115 Snowy Plover (Charadrius nivosus) nests were used to model relationships between nest survival, habitat characteristics, predator activity and human activity on four sandy, ocean-fronting beaches in coastal northern California from 2007-2009. Plover daily nest survival was higher at two southern sites (South Spit range = 0.98-0.99; Eel River Wildlife Area range = 0.91-0.96) compared with two northern sites (Mad River Beach range = 0.77-0.88; Clam Beach range = 0.79-0.89) where predator activity was appreciably higher. Nest survival was positively related to debris heterogeneity and negatively related to the amount of debris near the nest, but these relationships were weaker than the site-level effect. Although plovers select nest sites among cryptic debris in sparsely vegetated areas, restoration that creates and enhances such habitats may have limited utility at sites where predators are abundant. Thus, managers must carefully consider predator activity at the landscape level in order to maximize the effectiveness of fine-scale restoration efforts. Received 29 August 2011, accepted 24 August 2012.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据