4.0 Article

Use of Nape Tags for Marking Offspring of Precocial Waterbirds

期刊

WATERBIRDS
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 312-318

出版社

WATERBIRD SOC
DOI: 10.1675/063.034.0306

关键词

American Coot; color marking; King Eider; nape tag; resighting; retention; Ruddy Duck; survival; White-winged Scoter

资金

  1. Delta Waterfowl Foundation
  2. Arctic Institute of North America
  3. Canadian Wildlife Service (Prairie and Northern Wildlife Research Centre)
  4. Institute for Wetlands and Waterfowl Research (Ducks Unlimited Canada)
  5. National Science Foundation
  6. Nunavut Wildlife Management Board
  7. Polar Continental Shelf Project
  8. Redberry Lake World Biosphere Reserve
  9. University of Alberta
  10. University of California
  11. University of Minnesota
  12. University of Saskatchewan
  13. Iowa State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Individualized markers that allow organisms to be identified without recapture are invaluable for studies of survival, movement, and behavior. Nape tags consisting of brass safety pins with unique combinations of two or three colored plastic beads were used to mark 5,868 American Coot (Fulica americana) chicks and 331 Ruddy Duck (Oxyura jamaicensis), 157 King Eider (Somateria spectabilis) and 664 White-winged Scoter (Melanitta fusca deglandi) ducklings. These markers allowed for documentation of parent-offspring interactions, post-hatching survival, brood movements and brood-mixing behaviors. Nape tags were inexpensive, easy to make, easy to observe with binoculars or spotting scopes and provided over 100 two-bead or 1,000 three-bead color combinations for individual identification. For coots, there was no evidence of color biases affecting parental care or offspring survival, although some colors (white, yellow) were easier to detect than others (brown). The only observed problem was marker loss, with tag loss rates reaching 20% near fledging age. Nape tags worked effectively on coots and ducklings and may be useful for other precocial waterbirds. Received 4 February 2011, accepted 3 May 2011.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据