4.1 Article

Effects of plateau pika activities on seasonal plant biomass and soil properties in the alpine meadow ecosystems of the Tibetan Plateau

期刊

GRASSLAND SCIENCE
卷 61, 期 4, 页码 195-203

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/grs.12101

关键词

Biomass allocation; integrated pests management (IPM); roots:shoots (R:S); soil organic carbon; soil organic carbon density

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31100338]
  2. Chunhui Program of Ministry of Education, China [Z2010091]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC) Visiting Scholar Foundation
  4. Sichuan Agricultural University Fundamental Research Funds
  5. Royal Society-Wolfson Merit Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The foraging and burrowing activities of small mammalian herbivores may have either detrimental or beneficial effects on grassland ecosystems; the direction of the effect is determined by the species, population abundances and fluctuations. Twelve survey sites with active burrow of plateau pika were classified into four degrees of density: approximately zero-density, low-density, medium-density and high-density, to evaluate the impact of different pika densities on vegetation, plant biomass, soil organic carbon and nutrients in a whole growing season. We show that pika as a main supplement to livestock activities contributed to a decrease in the number of plant species, vegetation cover, plant height and seasonal mean biomass, while values at medium-density site except above-ground biomass were the lowest. With the exception of available potassium, soil organic carbon, nitrogen, total phosphorus and soil water content, zero-density areas were significantly higher than those of pika occupied areas. However, there were slight or no differences in vegetation characteristics and soil properties between medium-and high-density sites. Our study suggests pika activities with high-density made palatable forage less and soil carbon and nitrogen more than low-density, moreover, plateau pika had greater impacts on above-ground vegetation than on root system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据