4.5 Article

Application of a revised Water Poverty Index to target the water poor

期刊

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 63, 期 6, 页码 1099-1110

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2011.347

关键词

data management; Turkana district; water poverty; water poverty index

资金

  1. UNICEF (Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Office and Kenya Country Office)
  2. Rural Focus Ltd. Consultancy
  3. Agencia Catalana de Cooperacio al Desenvolupament (Generalitat de Catalunya, Spanish government)
  4. Centre de Cooperacio per al Desenvolupament (Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Water Poverty Index (WPI) has been recognized as a useful tool in policy analysis. The index integrates various physical, social and environmental aspects to enable more holistic assessment of water resources. However, soundness of this tool relies on two complementary aspects: (i) inadequate techniques employed in index construction would produce unreliable results, and (ii) poor dissemination of final outcome would reduce applicability of the index to influence policy-making. From a methodological point of view, a revised alternative to calculate the index was developed in a previous study. This paper is therefore concerned not with the method employed in index construction, but with how the composite can be applied to support decision-making processes. In particular, the paper examines different approaches to exploit the index as a policy tool. A number of alternatives to disseminate achieved results are presented. The implications of applying the composite at different spatial scales are highlighted. Turkana District, in Kenya has been selected as initial case study to test the applicability and validity of the index. The paper concludes that the WPI approach provides a relevant tool for guiding appropriate action and policy-making towards more equitable allocation of water resources. Key words 9 data management, Turkana district, water poverty, water poverty index

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据