4.7 Article

Morphodynamics of river-influenced back-barrier tidal basins: The role of landscape and hydrodynamic settings

期刊

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 12, 页码 9514-9535

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014WR015891

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Cantabria
  2. ANIMO program from the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sports [BIA2012-36822]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the morphodynamics of river-influenced barrier basins numerically, with a particular emphasis on the effects of landscape and hydrodynamic settings. The simulated morphologies are qualitatively comparable to natural systems (e.g., tidal inlets along the East Coast of the USA). Model results suggest that the basin morphology is governed by the relative importance of tidal and fluvial forcing which is reflected, to the first-order approximation, in the ratio (r(Q)) between the mean tidal and river discharge. In agreement with empirical knowledge, the model indicates that riverine influence can be neglected when r(Q) is larger than 20. On the other hand, the river may dominate when r(Q) is smaller than 5. Pronounced differences in morphodynamic evolution are observed for different landscape settings (i.e., initial basin bathymetries and river inflow locations), indicating their fundamental importance in governing the evolution of barrier basins. Model results also show that the addition of a river tends to compensate the flood dominance in the tidal basin. Overall, the river flow has limited influence on the volumetric change of tidal flats, while it plays a more important role in determining the depth of the tidal channels and the size of the ebb delta. The riverine sediment source appears to be more important in shaping the basin morphology when the fluvial forcing is stronger. Finally, we show that the presence of a large river in a tidal inlet system influences the performance of the widely adopted relation between tidal prism and inlet cross-sectional area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据