4.7 Article

Hydraulic and thermal effects of in-stream structure-induced hyporheic exchange across a range of hydraulic conductivities

期刊

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 6, 页码 4643-4661

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2013WR014758

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In-stream structure-induced hyporheic exchange and associated thermal dynamics affect stream ecosystems. Their importance is controlled by spatial variability of sediment hydraulic conductivity (K). We calibrated a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of surface and groundwater hydraulics near a channel-spanning weir (represents log dams, boulder weirs) to field data and varied K from 10(-7) to 10(-2) m/s (silt to gravel). Surface water stopped cresting the weir for K>10(-3) m/s. Non-Darcy hyporheic flow was also prevalent for K > 10(-3) m/s, and velocity errors using non-CFD models ranged up to 32.2%. We also modeled weir-induced heat transport during summer. As K increased from 10(-7) to 10(-3) m/s, weir-induced hyporheic heat advection steadily increased. Cooling and buffering along hyporheic flow paths decreased with increasing K, particularly above K=10(-5) and 10(-4) m/s, respectively. Vertical heat conduction between surface water and groundwater near the weir decreased with increasing K, particularly for K>10(-5) m/s. Conduction between hyporheic flow paths and adjacent groundwater helped cool hyporheic flow. Downstream surface water cooling by hyporheic advection increased steadily with K as increases in hyporheic flow overwhelmed decreases in cooling along hyporheic flow paths. Yet such effects were small (0.016 degrees C) even at K=10(-3) m/s. The largest thermal effect of weir-induced exchange was therefore spatial expansion of subsurface diel variability (particularly for K>10(-5) m/s) which affects benthic habitat and chemical reactions. The specific values of K where such trend shifts occur is likely variable among streams based on flow conditions, but we expect the presence of such trend shifts to be widespread.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据