4.7 Article

Spatial assessment of precipitation deficits in the Duero basin (central Spain) with multivariate extreme value statistics

期刊

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 10, 页码 6716-6730

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/wrcr.20490

关键词

multivariate extreme value statistics; droughts; Duero basin; extremal dependence; spatial analysis; SPI

资金

  1. EU Marie Curie COFUND program AMAROUT [PEOPLE-2007-2-3.COFUND]
  2. EU-FP7 ACQWA Project
  3. PEPER-GIS project
  4. ANR-MOPERA project
  5. ANR-McSim project
  6. MIRACCLE-GICC project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nonirrigated agriculture on the Iberian Peninsula is regularly affected by dry periods that can cause important losses. This paper focuses on the comparison of the classical Standard Precipitation Index (SPI) with a fragility index developed by the multivariate extreme value theory community, which is used to describe monthly precipitation deficits below 30.5 mm (about 1 mm/d) in the Spanish Duero basin. The multivariate extreme value model allows to capture relevant information concerning the dependence structure among extreme precipitation deficits. Maps of those extremal dependence summaries and of loadings of principal components of the SPI provide quantitative information for water management. In addition, jointly analyzing data from several stations improves the inference of uncertainty. Spatial patterns of extremal dependence emerged with respect to orographic features. Most severe dry spells occur in the southeast of the Duero basin. In central plain of the Duero basin, a predominantly agricultural area, a strong fragility index for severity of dry spells is particularly found in eastern regions. Results of the MEVT and SPI analysis point in the same direction. Beyond this, the MEVT assessment gives a quantitative measure of the dependence between stations and regions. Estimates of return periods for extreme dry spell severity are discussed. Deficits below 42.7 mm are also analyzed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据