4.7 Article

The Brazilian Water Resources Management Policy: Fifteen Years of Success and Challenges

期刊

WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
卷 27, 期 7, 页码 2287-2302

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-013-0288-1

关键词

Water resources management; Water reform; Brazil; National Water Resources Policy; National Water Resources Management System

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa no Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a result of the increasing global awareness about the importance of water, many developed and developing countries have reviewed their water resources management policies and laws. In Brazil, Law 9,433, enacted in (1997), establishes the National Water Resources Policy (NWRP) and the National Water Resource Management System (NWRMS), introducing a new integrated approach to water resources management through the application of planning and economic instruments. At the institutional level, this brought many changes. A new institutional framework was established with the creation of river basin committees and water agencies. Almost 15 years after the Law took effect, these changes are still being implemented, and some adjustments have been necessary. In light of the Brazilian NWRP, this paper presents and analyzes the legal and institutional reform that has been taking place in Brazil's water resources sector since 1997. An initial analysis shows that today, the implementation process still faces many challenges, hindering the effective consolidation of the instruments set out by Law 9,433/1997. The paper concludes that although Brazil's model is generally in line with international trends, and despite the major progress that has been made to date, in some hydrographic regions the instruments conceived in the country's model are still in the incipient stage of implementation, indicating that greater efforts are necessary, some of which are suggested in this article.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据