4.7 Article

Model-Supported Impact Assessment for the Water Sector in Central Germany Under Climate Change-A Case Study

期刊

WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
卷 25, 期 13, 页码 3113-3134

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-011-9848-4

关键词

Climate change; Impact assessment; Water resources; Hydrological regime; Model-support; Eco-hydrological model

资金

  1. State of Saxony-Anhalt, via its Ministry of Agriculture and Environment
  2. LAU
  3. PIK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate change challenges water managers and researchers to find sustainable management solutions, in order to avoid undesirable impacts on water resources, environment and water-dependent sectors. Needed are projections into the future for the main driving forces, the resulting pressures on water resources, and quantification of the impacts. Modeling studies can play an important role in investigating, quantifying, and communicating possible impacts of climate change, with account of uncertainty of the results. However, climate change related impacts and a need for adaptation still play a minor role in current river basin management plans that have to comply e.g. with the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD). One important reason is that climate impact assessment is generally done in research institutes, while management plans are designed by practitioners working in national and regional environmental agencies and water supply companies. Knowledge transfer from science to practice and visa versa is often missing. In the present study, we propose a methodology and a case study for model-supported decision making in the water sector applicable to a participatory water resources planning process. The methodology is applied in a case study investigating climate change impacts on water resources. The case study area is the German State of Saxony-Anhalt, where the task was to develop a climate change impact assessment including possible adaptation measures as basis for a federal adaptation directive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据