4.2 Article

Surface Water Deficiency Zoning of China Based on Surface Water Deficit Index (SWDI)

期刊

WATER RESOURCES
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 372-378

出版社

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1134/S0097807814040150

关键词

water deficiency; zoning; surface water deficit index; remote sensing

资金

  1. Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin (China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research) [IWHR-SKL-201116, IWHR-SK-201206]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZZD-EW-08]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51309210]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

China's economic and social development is severely restricted by regional water deficiency, and the determination of water deficiency level in different regions is an important basis of water resource management. In this study, we zoned 32 provinces of China into five surface water deficiency levels based on surface water deficit index derived from the Chinese meteorological satellite FY-2C images. The result shows that China is facing serious water shortage crisis with only 15.44% of total area without water deficiency, which is located in the south and southeast coast. More than 60% of total area of China suffered from severe or extremely water deficiency, which are mainly distributed in western and northern regions. Jingjinji area (namely Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei province), which is a special region with high amount of gross domestic product and relative abundant water resources, is suffering from severe water deficiency. It revealed that water resources were interacted with regional development and water management should consider local conditions. To Jingjinji area, water management should focus on adjustment of industrial structure, urban expansion control and scientific water resources allocation. In general, the surface water deficit index based water deficiency zoning will be of significant value to be applied in water resources management at regional scales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据