4.8 Article

Comparison of two PAC/UF processes for the removal of micropollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluent: Process performance and removal efficiency

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 26-36

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.02.038

关键词

PAC/UF; Organic micropollutants; Submerged ultrafiltration; Pressurized ultrafiltration; Advanced wastewater treatment

资金

  1. FOEN [UTF 349.29.10/IDM 2006.2423.30]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two hybrid membrane processes combining powdered activated carbon (PAC) adsorption with ultrafiltration (UF) were investigated regarding operational performance and efficiency to remove organic micropollutants from municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent. A pressurized PAC/UF (pPAC/UF) and a submerged PAC/UF (sPAK/UF) system were operated continuously over a period of six months. Both UF membrane systems showed good compatibilitywith the application of PAC showing no abrasion or other negative impacts. The pPAC/UF system reached permeability values up to 290 L/(m(2)h bar) at high fluxes of 80 L/(m(2)h) compared to the sPAC/UF with a permeability of up to 200 L/(m(2)h bar) at fluxes of up to 23 L/(m(2)h). Surface analysis of both membranes with scanning electron microscopy revealed no membrane deterioration after the six-month period of operation. On the surface of the pressurized membrane the formation of a PAC layer was observed, which may have contributed to the high permeability by forming a protective coating. Five micropollutants, i.e. sulfamethoxazole, carbamazepine, mecoprop, diclofenac and benzotriazole in ambient effluent concentrations were investigated. Both PAC/UF systems removed 60-95% of the selected micropollutants at a dosage of 20 mg PAC/L and 4 mg Fe3+/ L. However, extreme peak loads of sulfamethoxazole with concentrations of up to 30 mu g/L caused a considerable performance decrease for more than a week. 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据