4.8 Article

pH impact on reductive dechlorination of cis-dichloroethylene by Fe precipitates: An X-ray absorption spectroscopy study

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 17, 页码 6639-6649

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.08.035

关键词

cis-DCE; Reductive dechlorination; EXAFS; Green rust; Magnetite; Mackinawite

资金

  1. NSF [CBET-0730064]
  2. Korean Ministry of Environment as The GAIA Project [173-092-011]
  3. Research Fund Program of Research Institute for Basic Sciences, Pusan National University [RIBS-PNU-2010-309]
  4. Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  5. National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources, Biomedical Technology Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pH impact on reductive dechlorination of cis-dichloroethylene (cis-DCE) was investigated using in situ Fe precipitates formed under iron-rich sulfate-reducing conditions. The dechlorination rate of cis-DCE increased with pH, which was attributed to changes in the solid-phase Fe concentration, the composition of Fe minerals, and the surface speciation of Fe minerals. With increasing pH, larger quantities of Fe minerals, having much greater reactivity than dissolved Fe(II), were produced. Fe-K edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) analysis of Fe precipitates revealed the presence of multiple Fe phases with their composition varying with pH. Correlation analyses were performed to examine how the solid-phase Fe concentration, the composition of Fe minerals, and their surface speciation were linked with the cis-DCE dechlorination rate. Such analyses revealed that neither mackinawite (FeS) nor magnetite (Fe3O4) was reactive with cis-DCE dechlorination, but that Fe (oxyhydr)oxides including green rusts and Fe(OH)(2) were reactive. Based on a proposed model of the surface acidity of Fe minerals, the increasing deprotonated surface Fe(II) groups with pH correlated well with the enhanced cis-DCE dechlorination. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据