4.8 Article

Metabolic versatility in full-scale wastewater treatment plants performing enhanced biological phosphorus removal

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 19, 页码 7032-7041

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.08.042

关键词

Polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAO); Glycogen accumulating organisms (GAO); TCA cycle; Glycolysis; Glycogen; Return sludge side-stream hydrolysis (RSS)

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [PTDC/AAC-AMB/120581/2010, SFRH/BD29477/2006, SFRH / BPD / 88382 / 2012]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/AAC-AMB/120581/2010] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analysed the enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) microbial community and metabolic performance of five full-scale EBPR systems by using fluorescence in situ hybridisation combined with off-line batch tests fed with acetate under anaerobic aerobic conditions. The phosphorus accumulating organisms (PAOs) in all systems were stable and showed little variability between each plant, while glycogen accumulating organisms (GAOs) were present in two of the plants. The metabolic activity of each sludge showed the frequent involvement of the anaerobic tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) in PAO metabolism for the anaerobic generation of reducing equivalents, in addition to the more frequently reported glycolysis pathway. Metabolic variability in the use of the two pathways was also observed, between different systems and in the same system over time. The metabolic dynamics was linked to the availability of glycogen, where a higher utilisation of the glycolysis pathway was observed in the two systems employing side-stream hydrolysis, and the TCA cycle was more active in the A(2)O systems. Full-scale plants that showed higher glycolysis activity also exhibited superior P removal performance, suggesting that promotion of the glycolysis pathway over the TCA cycle could be beneficial towards the optimisation of EBPR systems. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据