4.8 Article

Evaluation of DNA extraction methods for freshwater eukaryotic microalgae

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 16, 页码 5355-5364

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.07.023

关键词

Waste stabilization ponds; Microalgae; Molecular techniques; DNA extraction; DGGE; Community analysis

资金

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences at Newcastle University
  2. Royal Society [JP090804]
  3. RCUK Academic Fellowship [RES88007300]
  4. EPSRC [EP/I025782/1]
  5. EPSRC [EP/I025782/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I025782/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of molecular methods to investigate microalgal communities of natural and engineered freshwater resources is in its infancy, with the majority of previous studies carried out by microscopy. Inefficient or differential DNA extraction of microalgal community members can lead to bias in downstream community analysis. Three commercially available DNA extraction kits have been tested on a range of pure culture freshwater algal species with diverse cell walls and mixed algal cultures taken from eutrophic waste stabilization ponds (WSP). DNA yield and quality were evaluated, along with DNA suitability for amplification of 18S rRNA gene fragments by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). QiagenDNeasy (R) Blood and Tissue kit (QBT), was found to give the highest DNA yields and quality. Denaturant Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) was used to assess the diversity of communities from which DNA was extracted. No significant differences were found among kits when assessing diversity. QBT is recommended for use with WSP samples, a conclusion confirmed by further testing on communities from two tropical WSP systems. The fixation of microalgal samples with ethanol prior to DNA extraction was found to reduce yields as well as diversity and is not recommended. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据