4.8 Article

Doping of biogenic Pd catalysts with Au enables dechlorination of diclofenac at environmental conditions

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 8, 页码 2718-2726

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.02.036

关键词

Bimetallic catalysts; Biogenic metals; Dehalogenation; Diclofenac

资金

  1. Fund of Scientific Research Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen)
  2. Ghent University [01 MRA 510W]
  3. EU [266039, FP7-KBBE-2010.3.5.01]
  4. EU ULIXES [266473, FP7-KBBE-2010-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By using the metal reducing capacities of bacteria, Pd nanoparticles can be produced in a sustainable way ('bio-Pd'). These bio-Pd nanoparticles can be used as a catalyst in, for example, dehalogenation reactions. However, some halogenated compounds are not efficiently degraded using a bio-Pd catalyst. This study shows that the activity of bio-Pd can be improved by doping with Au(0) ('bio-Pd/Au'). In contrast with bio-Pd, bio-Pd/Au could perform the removal of the model pharmaceutical compound diclofenac from an aqueous medium in batch experiments at neutral pH and with H-2 as the hydrogen donor (first order decay constant of 0.078 +/- 0.009 h(-1)). Dehalogenation was for both catalysts the only observed reaction. For bio-Pd/Au, a disproportional increase of catalytic activity was observed with increasing Pd-content of the catalyst. In contrast, when varying the Au-content of the catalyst, a Pd/Au mass ratio of 50/1 showed the highest catalytic activity (first order decay value of 0.52 +/- 0.02 h(-1)). The removal of 6.40 mu g L-1 diclofenac from a wastewater treatment plant effluent using bio-Pd was not possible even after prolonged reaction time. However, by using the most active bio-Pd/Au catalyst, 43.8 +/- 0.5% of the initially present diclofenac could be removed after 24 h. This study shows that doping of bio-Pd nanoparticles with Au(0) can be a promising approach for the reductive treatment of wastewaters containing halogenated contaminants. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据