4.8 Article

Freshwater DOM quantity and quality from a two-component model of UV absorbance

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 14, 页码 4532-4542

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.021

关键词

Dissolved organic carbon; Dissolved organic matter; Model; UV absorbance

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  2. NSERC Strategic Grant
  3. National Science Foundation's (NSF) Niwot Ridge Long Term Ecological Research Program [DEB-0423662]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology [1027341] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010023] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a model that considers UV-absorbing dissolved organic matter (DOM) to consist of two components (A and B), each with a distinct and constant spectrum. Component A absorbs UV light strongly, and is therefore presumed to possess aromatic chromophores and hydrophobic character, whereas B absorbs weakly and can be assumed hydrophilic. We parameterised the model with dissolved organic carbon concentrations [DOC] and corresponding UV spectra for c. 1700 filtered surface water samples from North America and the United Kingdom, by optimising extinction coefficients for A and B, together with a small constant concentration of non-absorbing DOM (0.80 mg DOC L-1). Good unbiased predictions of [DOC] from absorbance data at 270 and 350 nm were obtained (r(2) = 0.98), the sum of squared residuals in [DOC] being reduced by 66% compared to a regression model fitted to absorbance at 270 nm alone. The parameterised model can use measured optical absorbance values at any pair of suitable wavelengths to calculate both [DOC] and the relative amounts of A and B in a water sample, i.e. measures of quantity and quality. Blind prediction of [DOC] was satisfactory for 9 of 11 independent data sets (181 of 213 individual samples). (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据