4.8 Article

Competition of Escherichia coli O157 with a drinking water bacterial community at low nutrient concentrations

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 19, 页码 6279-6290

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.08.043

关键词

Competition; Escherichia coli O157; EHEC; Risk assessment; Pathogen growth; Assimilable organic carbon (AOC)

资金

  1. TECHNEAU [018320]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In contrast to studies on (long-term) survival of enteric pathogens in the environment, investigations on the principles of their growth and competition with autochthonous aquatic bacteria are rare and unexplored. Hence, improved basic knowledge is crucial for an adequate risk assessment and for understanding (and avoiding) the spreading of waterborne diseases. Therefore, the pathogen Escherichia coli O157 was grown in competition with a drinking water bacterial community on natural assimilable organic carbon (AOC) originating from diluted wastewater, in both batch and continuous culture. Growth was monitored by flow cytometry enabling enumeration of total cell concentration as well as specific E. coli O157 detection using fluorescently-labelled antibodies. An enhanced competitive fitness of E. coli O157 with higher AOC concentrations, higher temperatures and increased dilution rates (continuous culture) was observed. A classical opportunist versus gleaner relationship, where E. coli 0157 is the opportunist, specialised for growth at high nutrient concentrations (mu(max): 0.87 h(-1) and K-S: 489 mu g consumed DOC L-1), and the bacterial community is the gleaner adapted to nutrient-poor environments (mu(max): 0.33 h(-1) and K-S: 7.4 mu g consumed DOC L-1) was found. The obtained competition results can be explained by the growth properties of the two competitors determined in pure cultures and it was possible to model many of the observed dynamics based on Monod kinetics. The study provides new insights into the principles governing competition of an enteric pathogen with autochthonous aquatic bacteria. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据