4.8 Article

Probing the stoichiometry of the nitrification process using the respirometric approach

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 18, 页码 5954-5962

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.08.006

关键词

Nitrification; Nitrifier yield; Ammonia assimilation; Oxygen uptake; Stoichiometry

资金

  1. Army Research Lab (ARL) through Lenard Wood Institute (LWI) and Frontier Environmental Technology, LLC
  2. Environmental Research Center (ERC) at Missouri University Science and Technology
  3. Rolla Southeast Wastewater Treatment Plant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantifying oxygen demand and nitrifier yield are important in the design and operation of advanced wastewater treatment systems. However, the accurate stoichiometry of the autotrophic nitrification process has not been fully developed. In this research, stoichiometric links between nitrifier yield, ammonia and nitrite oxidization, ammonia assimilation, and oxygen uptake for each step of the nitrification process were determined. A pulse-flow respirometer was used to measure the oxygen uptake for complete nitrification and nitrite oxidation reactions. Results indicated that the specific oxygen uptake was 4.23 mg-O-2/mg-N oxidized for complete nitrification, with 3.17 mg-O-2/mg-N oxidized for ammonia oxidation (first step nitrification) and 1.06 mg-O-2/mg-N oxidized for nitrite oxidation (second step nitrification). For the complete nitrification, fractions of ammonia used for electron donation, synthesis of ammonia oxidizers, and synthesis of nitrite oxidizers were 97.1%, 2.2%, and 0.7%, respectively. The fractions of electrons transferred into cell synthesis were approximately 7.5% for ammonia oxidation and 7.3% for nitrite oxidation. Biomass yield coefficients for ammonia oxidizers and nitrite oxidizers were 0.18 and 0.06 g-VSS/g-N oxidized, respectively. These parameters are critical when calculating oxygen needs and nitrifier biomass concentrations during the design of advanced wastewater treatment processes. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据