4.8 Article

TiO2 and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) coated polyester filter in bioreactor for wastewater treatment

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 6, 页码 1969-1978

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.01.017

关键词

Membrane bioreactor; Composite membrane; Fouling resistance; Hydrophilic modification; Dynamic contact angle

资金

  1. China National Natural Science Foundation [21177018]
  2. Ministry of Environment Protection [2008 ZX07208-004-03]
  3. Dalian University of Technology
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT) [IRT0813]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prepared by coating TiO2/polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) on a low cost polyester filter cloth (22 pm), a composite membrane (10 mu m pore size) was successfully used in an anoxic/oxic membrane bioreactor (A/O-MBR) for treating a simulate wastewater in removing nitrate/ammonium for water reuse in a polyester fiber production plant. Its permeate flux and the anti-fouling properties against extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) were studied. Comparing with a commercial (0.1 mu m) PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) membrane, similar effluent qualities were achieved, meeting the basic COD requirements for reuse. Anti-EPS accumulation, the TiO2/PVA Polyester composite membrane had higher sustained permeability and required less frequent cleaning. Its filtration time was 4 times longer when operated at a higher flux than the PVDF membrane. The nano-TiO2 enhances the interaction between PVA and polyester, forms a more hydrophilic surface, drastically reduces the contact angle with water and reduces EPS fouling. The slow (trans-membrane pressure) TMP rise, loose cake layer, the low filtration resistances, and the EPS, SEM analysis confirmed the advantage of the composite membrane. Potential in lowering the membrane cost, the operation and maintenance cost, and in enhancing MBR waste water treatment efficiency is expected by the use of this new composite membrane. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据