4.8 Article

Partition of pollution between dissolved and particulate phases: What about emerging substances in urban stormwater catchments?

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 913-925

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.09.032

关键词

Priority substances; Stormwater; Environmental quality standards; Sediment quality guidelines; Water quality

资金

  1. Seine-Normandy Water Agency (AESN)
  2. Interdepartmental Association for Sewage Disposal in Paris Conurbation (SIAAP)
  3. Municipality of Paris
  4. Water and Sewage Disposal Departmental Administrations of Seine Saint Denis [DEA93]
  5. Water and Sewage Disposal Departmental Administration of Val de Marne [DSEA94]
  6. Regional Council of Ile de France (CRIF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents results about the occurrence, the concentrations of urban priority substances on both the dissolved and the particulate phases in stormwater. Samples were collected at the outlet of a dense urban catchment in Paris suburb (2.30 km(2)). 13 chemical groups were investigated including 88 individual substances. Results showed that stormwater discharges contained 45 substances among them some metals, organotins, PAHs, PCBs, alkylphenols, pesticides, phthalates, cholorophenols and one volatile organic compound, i.e. methylene chloride. With respect to the European Water Framework Directive, these substances included 47% of the priority hazardous substances (n = 8), 38% of the priority substances (n = 10). The remaining substances (n = 27) belong to a list of others specific urban substances not included in the Water Framework Directive but monitored during this work. Finally, stormwater quality was evaluated by comparing the substance concentrations to environmental quality standards (EQS) and the particulate content to Canadian sediment quality guidelines. This showed that stormwater was highly contaminated and should be treated before being discharged to receiving waters in order to avoid any adverse impact on the river quality. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据