4.8 Article

An effective pathway for the removal of microcystin LR via anoxic biodegradation in lake sediments

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 44, 期 6, 页码 1884-1892

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.11.025

关键词

Microcystin; Adda; Anoxic; Degradation; Sediment

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [20607016]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2008CB418101]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2007AA06Z304]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aerobic biodegradation has been considered to be the main attenuation mechanism for microcystins, but the role of anoxic biodegradation remains unclear. We investigated the potential for anoxic biodegradation of microcystin and the effects of environmental factors on the process through a series of well-controlled microcosm experiments using lake sediments as inocula. Microcystin LR could be degraded anoxically from 5 mg L-1 to below the detection limit at 25 degrees C within 2 days after a lag phase of 2 days. The rate was highly dependent on temperature, with a favorable temperature range of 2G-30 degrees C. The addition of glucose or low levels of NH4-N had no effect on the anoxic biodegradation of microcystin, whereas the addition of NO3-N significantly inhibited the biodegradation at all experimental concentrations, and the inhibition increased with increasing amount of NO3-Namended. Adda (3-amino-9-methoxy-2,6,8-trimethyl-10-phenyl-deca-4,6-dienoic acid), a previously reported nontoxic product of aerobic degradation of microcystin, was identified as the anoxic biodegradation product. This is the first report of Adda as a degradation product of microcystin under anoxic conditions. No other product containing Adda residue was detected during the anoxic degradation of microcystin. These results strongly indicated that anoxic biodegradation is an effective removal pathway of microcystin in lake sediments, and represents a significant bioremediation potential. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据