4.8 Article

Sorption of quaternary ammonium compounds to municipal sludge

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 44, 期 7, 页码 2303-2313

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.12.029

关键词

Quaternary ammonium compounds; Adsorption; Desorption; Municipal sludge; Kinetics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sorptive behavior of four quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) - hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium chloride (C(16)TMA), dodecyl trimethyl ammonium chloride (C(12)TMA), hexadecyl benzyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (C(16)BDMA), and dodecyl benzyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (C(12)BDMA) - to municipal primary, waste activated, mesophilic digested, and thermophilic digested sludges was assessed at 22 C. Batch adsorption of all four separately tested QACs to primary sludge reached equilibrium within 4h. At a nominal, initial QAC concentration of 300 mg/L and a sludge volatile solids concentration of 1 g/L, the extent of adsorption was 13, 88, 67, and 89% for the C(12)TMA, C(16)TMA, C(12)BDMA, and C(16)BDMA, respectively, and correlated positively to the QAC hydrophobicity and negatively to their critical micelle concentration. Equilibrium partitioning data were described by the Freundlich isotherm model. The adsorption capacity of the four sludges was very similar. In binary QAC mixtures, QACs with relatively high adsorption affinity and at relatively high aqueous concentrations decreased the adsorption of QACs with a low adsorption affinity. At pH 7, about 40% of the sludge-C(12)TMA desorbed, whereas less than 5% of the sludge-C(16)BDMA desorbed in 10 days. The effect of pH was negligible on the desorption extent of C(12)TMA at a pH range 4-10 over 10 days, whereas increasing the solution pH to 10 resulted in more than 50% desorption of C(16)BDMA. Given the fact that approximately 50% of the municipal biosolids are land-applied in the US, the data of this study would help in the assessment of the fate of QACs and their potential effect on human and environmental health. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据