4.8 Article

Kinetics and mechanism for degradation of dichlorvos by permanganate in drinking water treatment

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 43, 期 14, 页码 3435-3442

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.05.001

关键词

Dichlorvos; Permanganate; Kinetics; Mechanism; Drinking water treatment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20677071]
  2. Key Technology R&D Programs from Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2006BAJ08B02, 2006BAJ08B10]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Aquatic Chemistry [08Z01ESPCR]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The degradation kinetics and mechanism of dichlorvos by permanganate during drinking water treatment were investigated. The reaction of dichlorvos with permanganate was of second-order overall with negligible pH dependence and an activation energy of 29.5 kJ.mol(-1). At pH 7.0 and 25 degrees C, the rate constant was 25.2 +/- 0.4 M-1 s(-1). Dichlorvos was first degraded to trimethyl phosphate (TMP) and dimethyl phosphate (DMP) simultaneously which approximately accounted for <5% and >= 95% with respect to phosphorus mass, respectively. Further oxidation of DMP generated a final byproduct, monomethyl phosphate (MMP). MMP was for the first time identified as a major byproduct in chemical oxidation of dichlorvos. The kinetic model based on degradation mechanism and determined reaction rate constants allowed us to predict the evolution of dichlorvos and its byproduct concentrations during permanganate pre-oxidation process at water treatment plants. These results suggest that even though the dichlorvos concentration in surface water complies with the surface water quality standards of China (50 mu g L-1), its concentration after conventional water treatment will most probably exceed the drinking water quality standards (1 mu g L-1). Moreover, luminescent bacteria test shows that the acute toxicity of dichlorvos solution evidently increased after permanganate oxidation. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据