4.8 Article

Adsorption of rotavirus and bacteriophage MS2 using glass fiber coated with hematite nanoparticles

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 43, 期 20, 页码 5198-5208

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.08.031

关键词

Rotavirus; Inactivation; Reversible electrostatic adsorption; Competition; Hematite nanoparticles

资金

  1. WaterCAMPWS
  2. National Science Foundation [CTS-0120978]
  3. USDA [2008-35102-19143]
  4. Fulbright Fellowship
  5. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-07ER46453, DE-FG02-07ER46471]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Batch and flow-through experiments were conducted to investigate the removal and inactivation of rotavirus (RV) and bacteriophage MS2 using glass fiber coated with hematite nanoparticles. Batch tests showed a high removal of MS2 (2.49 x 10(11) plaque forming unit/g) and RV (8.9 x 1066 focal forming unit/g) at a low concentration of hematite nanoparticles in solution (0.043 g/L and 0.26 g/L, respectively). Virus adsorption was, however, decreased in the presence of bicarbonate ions and natural organic matter (NOM) in solution, suggesting a great affinity of iron oxide nanoparticles for these competitors. Adsorption on hematite nanoparticles by MS2 and RV was also tested with aquifer groundwater under saturated flow conditions to mimic environmental conditions with promising results (8 x 10(8) plaque forming unit/g and 3 x 10(4) focal forming unit/g, respectively). Desorption of up to 63% of infectious MS2 and only 2% of infectious RV from hematite nanoparticles were achieved when an eluant solution containing beef extract and glycine was used. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images showed evidence of electrostatic adsorption of apparently intact MS2 and structurally damaged RV particles to hematite nanoparticles. Results from this research suggest that a cartridge made of glass fiber coated with hematite nanoparticles could be used as a point-of-use device for virus removal for drinking water treatment. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据