4.8 Article

Removal of arsenic from water: Effects of competing anions on As(III) removal in KMnO4-Fe(II) process

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 43, 期 15, 页码 3891-3899

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.06.008

关键词

Arsenic removal; Competing anions; Sulfate; Phosphate; Silicate; Humic acid; KMnO4-Fe(II) process

资金

  1. State Key Lab of Urban Water Resource and Environment (HIT) [08UWES03]
  2. Program Foundation of Ministry of Education of China for New Faculty [200802131053]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effects of sulfate, phosphate, silicate and humic acid (HA) on the removal of As(III) in the KMnO4-Fe(II) process were investigated in the pH range of 4-9 with permanganate and ferrous sulfate applied at selected dosage. Sulfate decreased the removal of arsenic by 6.5-36.0% at pH 6-9 and the decrease in adsorption did not increase with increasing concentration of sulfate from 50 to 100 mg/L. In the presence of 1 mg/L phosphate, arsenic removal decreased gradually as pH increased from 4 to 6, and a sharp drop occurred at pH 7-9. The presence of 10 mg/L silicate had negligible effect on arsenic removal at pH 4-5 whereas decreased the arsenic removal at pH 6-9 and the decrease was more significant at higher pH. The presence of HA dramatically decreased the arsenic removal over the pH range of 6-9 and HA of higher concentration resulted in greater drop in arsenic removal. The effects of the competing anions on arsenic removal in the KMnO4-Fe(II) process were highly dependent on pH and the degree of these four anions influencing As(III) removal decreased in the following order, phosphate > humic acid > silicate > sulfate. Sulfate differed from the other three anions because sulfate decreased the removal of arsenic mainly by competitive adsorption while phosphate, silicate and HA decreased the removal of As(III) by competitive adsorption and sequestering the formation of ferric hydroxide derived from Fe(II). Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据