4.8 Article

Systematic evaluation of nitrate and perchlorate bioreduction kinetics in groundwater using a hydrogen-based membrane biofilm reactor

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 173-181

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.09.035

关键词

Membrane biofilm reactor; Hydrogen; Groundwater; Nitrate; Perchlorate; Simultaneous bioreduction

资金

  1. United States Environmental Protection Agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To evaluate the simultaneous reduction kinetics of the oxidized compounds, we treated nitrate-contaminated groundwater (similar to 9.4 mg-N/L) containing low concentrations of perchlorate (similar to 12.5 mu g/L) and saturated with dissolved oxygen (similar to 8 mg/L) in a hydrogen-based membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR). We systematically increased the hydrogen availability and simultaneously varied the surface loading of the oxidized compounds on the biofilm in order to provide a comprehensive, quantitative data set with which to evaluate the relationship between electron donor (H-2) availability, surface loading of the electron acceptors (oxidized compounds), and simultaneous bioreduction of the electron acceptors. Increasing the H-2 pressure delivered more H-2 gas, and the total H-2 flux increased linearly from similar to 0.04 mg/cm(2)-d for 0.5 psig (0.034 atm) to 0.13 mg/cm(2)-d for 9.5 psig (0.65 atm). This increased rate of H-2 delivery allowed for continued reduction of the acceptors as their surface loading increased. The electron acceptors had a clear hydrogen-utilization order when the availability of hydrogen was limited: oxygen, nitrate, nitrite, and then perchlorate. Spiking the influent with perchlorate or nitrate allowed us to identify the maximum surface loadings that still achieved more than 99.5% reduction of both oxidized contaminants: 0.21 mg NO3-N/cm(2)-d and 3.4 mu g ClO4/cm(2)-d. Both maximum values appear to be controlled by factors other than hydrogen availability. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据