4.8 Article

Degradation of reactive dyes in wastewater from the textile industry by ozone: Analysis of the products by accurate masses

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 733-743

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.006

关键词

Reactive dyes; LC-MS; Accurate masses; Ozone; Decolorization; Degradation products; Textile wastewater

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  2. German State of North Rhine-Westphalia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present work describes the use of ozone to degrade selected reactive dyes from the textile industry and the analysis of the resulting complex mixture by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC-MS). To allow certain identification of the substances detected in the wastewater, the original dyes were also investigated either separately or in a synthetic mixture of three dyes (trichromie), Since the reactive dyes are hydrolyzed during the dyeing process, procedures for the hydrolysis were worked out first for the individual dyes. The ozonated solutions were concentrated by solid-phase extraction, which separated very polar or ionic substances from moderately polar degradation products. The latter, which are the primary degradation products, were investigated by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry with a tandem quadrupole time-of-flight mass analyzer. Accurate masses, which in most cases could be determined with a deviation of <= 5 ppm from the exact value, were also measured. In addition, a diode-array detector was placed before the mass analyzer to provide UV-vis spectra of the products in the same run. With retention times, mass spectra, accurate masses, UV-vis spectra and, of course, knowledge of the structures of the original dyes, plausible structures could be proposed for most of the components of the moderately polar fraction. These structures were confirmed by (1)H NMR in cases where it was practical to isolate the degradation products by preparative HPLC. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据