4.2 Article

Patterns and controlling factors of residential water use in Los Angeles, California

期刊

WATER POLICY
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 1054-1069

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wp.2014.029

关键词

Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI); Landscape; Los Angeles; Regression model; Residential water consumption

资金

  1. NSF ULTRA-EX Grant [BCS-0948914]
  2. NSF Hydrologic Sciences Program CAREER Grant [EAR0846662]
  3. NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship [NNX11AL40H]
  4. NASA [NNX11AL40H, 142907] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [0846662] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Earth Sciences [0846662] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Earth Sciences
  8. Directorate For Geosciences [1204442] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current study evaluates residential water use patterns and driving factors across Los Angeles, California. Ten years of monthly residential water data were obtained from the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. Socio-economic, vegetation characteristics, climate, and water pricing data were utilized to develop a statistical model to determine controlling factors of single-family residential water use. Key drivers were found to be household income, landscape greenness, water pricing, household volume allocation, precipitation and temperature. Results show that low water users are less sensitive to climate variability than high water users, likely because these customers have reduced outdoor water use. In the lower income group, average household size is a predictor for household water consumption, which increases with more residents. Lower water users are also more sensitive to changes in their first level household water allocation (Tier 1). However, low, medium and high water users all respond more to changes in the Tier 1 rate than the Tier 2 rate, and generally reduce consumption if this block rate is increased.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据