4.6 Article

Removal of Copper Ions from Simulated Wastewaters Using Different Bicomponent Polymer Membranes

期刊

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
卷 225, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-014-2079-6

关键词

Copper ions; Electrodialysis; Wastewater treatment; Bicomponent polymer membranes

资金

  1. CNCSIS [TD CH410806, 26]
  2. National Authority for Scientific Research (CNCSIS, Romania)
  3. Project Postdoctoral programme for training scientific researchers [POSDRU/89/ 1.5/S/58852]
  4. European Social Found within the Sectorial Operational Program Human Resources Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main goal of this study was to explore the suitability and performance of bicomponent polymer membranes based on acrylonitrile copolymers-polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) mixtures and small quantities of anion (Purolite A100) or cation exchange resin (Purolite C150), prepared by phase inversion. Membranes were used for copper removal from synthetic wastewater solutions. A three detachable cylindrical compartment electrodialysis cell without recirculation of the electrolytes and synthetic solutions of various concentrations, similar to a copper electrowinning electrolyte, were used. The electrodialysis unit operates under galvanostatic control. The effect of pH on electrodialysis separation of Cu2+ and on the solution conductivity has been also investigated. The laboratory electrodialysis cell performance was evaluated in Willis of percent of extraction (pc) and current efficiency (cc). Experimental results showed that the ionic transfer in electrodialysis cell was especially affected by concentration. The highest values for the pe (>81 %) and the cc (>25 %) of copper ions were obtained at maximum concentration in copper ions (3 g/L), indicating a better performance of the ion extraction. The transport of copper ions was also correlated with flux data. The ion exchange membranes were characterized using FT-IR spectroscopy, ESEM, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据