4.6 Article

A Comparative Study of Trichloroethylene (TCE) Degradation in Contaminated Groundwater (GW) and TCE-Spiked Deionised Water Using Zero Valent Iron (ZVI) Under Various Mass Transport Conditions

期刊

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
卷 224, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-013-1718-7

关键词

TCE; Zero valent iron; Groundwater; Permeable reactive barrier; Batch experiment; Mass transport

资金

  1. CRC CARE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The work reported here demonstrates that zero valent iron (ZVI), a material used in permeable reactive barriers, yields degradation rate constants for trichloroethylene (TCE) that are considerably different depending on whether they are determined in deionised water or in groundwater. Batch studies using ZVI and TCE-spiked deionised (DI) water and TCE-contaminated groundwater revealed that within 50 h, 80 % of the TCE present in groundwater was mineralised, compared to TCE-spiked deionised water in which only 50 % of TCE was demineralised by ZVI in 50 h. In both TCE-spiked groundwater and DI water, cis-dichloroethylene was the major by-product, and it was reduced together with TCE after 96 h of treatment. Along with changes in concentrations of TCE and its metabolites, increased levels of chloride confirmed TCE degradation. TCE-spiked groundwater gave a higher rate constant (k) under similar conditions. The elevated chloride (830 mg/l) concentrations of the groundwater could be a possible reason for this higher rate constant, in spite of the fact that groundwater also contains higher inorganic carbon (132 mg/l) and calcium (26 mg/l) and has a pH of 7.9. The rate constant (0.017-0.03223 h(-1)) and half-life of TCE (21.5 to 40 h) are within the reported ranges in the literature. The implications of the results for the performance of ZVI in permeable reactive barriers are that not only groundwater chemistry, but also groundwater flow conditions, plays a key role in TCE degradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据