4.6 Review

Microbial resource utilization traits and trade-offs: implications for community structure, functioning, and biogeochemical impacts at present and in the future

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00254

关键词

microbes; nutrient uptake; resource competition; diversity; trait-based models; trait evolution; global change; warming

资金

  1. NSF [OCE-092881, CRET-1134215, DER-0845932, DEB-0845825]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology [1136657] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology [0845932, 1136710] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1134215] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  9. Directorate For Geosciences [0928819] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trait-based approaches provide a mechanistic framework to understand and predict the structure and functioning of microbial communities. Resource utilization traits and tradeoffs are among key microbial traits that describe population dynamics and competition among microbes. Several important trade-offs have been identified for prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbial taxa that define contrasting ecological strategies and contribute to species coexistence and diversity. The shape, dimensionality, and hierarchy of trade-offs may determine coexistence patterns and need to be better characterized. Laboratory measured resource utilization traits can be used to explain temporal and spatial structure and dynamics of natural microbial communities and predict biogeochemical impacts. Global environmental change can alter microbial community composition through altering resource utilization by different microbes and, consequently, may modify biogeochemical impacts of microbes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据