4.6 Article

A Comprehensive Study of Deep Catalytic Oxidation of Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Acetate, and their Mixtures over Pd/ZSM-5 Catalyst: Mutual Effects and Kinetics

期刊

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
卷 209, 期 1-4, 页码 365-376

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-009-0205-7

关键词

Pd/ZSM-5; Catalytic oxidation; VOC; Mixed effect; Reaction kinetics

资金

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [20725723]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2004CB719500]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2006AA06A310]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reaction behaviors and kinetics of catalytic oxidation of benzene, toluene, and ethyl acetate with feed concentrations in the range of 700-5,000 ppm over Pd/ZSM-5 catalyst were investigated. Results for single components show that ethyl acetate (T (50) = 190-200A degrees C) is more easily oxidized than benzene (T (50) = 215-225A degrees C) and toluene (T (50) = 225-235A degrees C). The conversion of ethyl acetate was increased with the increase of its feeding concentration, while the opposite behaviors were observed for benzene and toluene as their conversion rates were decreased with the increase of the inlet concentration. Different behaviors were observed in catalytic oxidation of volatile organic compound (VOC) multi-components, the presence of benzene or toluene inhibits the conversion of ethyl acetate, and the aromatic hydrocarbons inhibit each other in all cases. Ethyl acetate possesses obvious inhibitory effect on benzene oxidation, while it is interesting to note that ethyl acetate has a promotion effect on toluene conversion. The kinetic data were fitted by the Power-law and Mars-van Krevelen kinetic models. The fitting result shows that the Power-law model is more suitable for predicting the conversion of benzene than the other VOCs, and the Mars-van Krevelen model can accurately express the reaction rate of all investigated VOCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据