4.5 Article

Solid recovered fuels in the cement industry with special respect to hazardous waste

期刊

WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 404-412

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0734242X12440480

关键词

Solid recovered fuels; cement industry; hazardous waste; alternative fuels; waste incineration; waste preconditioning; co-incineration; positive list

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cements with good technical properties have been produced in Europe since the nineteenth century and are now worldwide standardized high-quality mass products with enormous production numbers. The basic component for cement is the so-called clinker which is produced mainly from raw meal (limestone plus clay plus sands) in a rotary kiln with preheater and progressively with integrated calciner, at temperatures up to 1450 AC. This process requires large amounts of fossil fuels and is CO2-intensive. But most CO2 is released by lime decomposition during the burning process. In the 1980s the use of alternative fuels began - firstly in the form of used oil and waste tyres and then increasingly by pre-conditioned materials from commercial waste and from high calorific industrial waste (i.e. solid recovered fuel (SRF)) - as well as organic hazardous waste materials such as solvents, pre-conditioned with sawdust. Therefore the cement industry is more and more a competitor in the waste-to-energy market - be it for municipal waste or for hazardous waste, especially concerning waste incineration, but also for other co-incineration plants. There are still no binding EU rules identifying which types of SRF or hazardous waste could be incinerated in cement kilns, but there are some well-made country-specific 'positive lists', for example in Switzerland and Austria. Thus, for proper planning in the cement industry as well as in the waste management field, waste disposal routes should be considered properly, in order to avoid surplus capacities on one side and shortage on the other

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据