4.2 Article

Analysis of leucocyte antibodies, cytokines, lysophospholipids and cell microparticles in blood components implicated in post-transfusion reactions with dyspnoea

期刊

VOX SANGUINIS
卷 108, 期 1, 页码 27-36

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/vox.12190

关键词

cytokines; leucocyte antibodies; lysophospholipids; microparticles; pulmonary post-transfusion reactions

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Poland) [NN 401215734]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and ObjectivesPost-transfusion reactions with dyspnoea (PTR) are major causes of morbidity and death after blood transfusion. Transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) and transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) are most dangerous, while transfusion-associated dyspnoea (TAD) is a milder respiratory distress. We investigated blood components for immune and non-immune factors implicated in PTR. Material and MethodsWe analysed 464 blood components (RBCs, PLTs, L-PLTs, FFP) transfused to 271 patients with PTR. Blood components were evaluated for 1/antileucocyte antibodies, 2/cytokines: IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-, sCD40L, 3/lysophosphatidylcholines (LysoPCs), 4/microparticles (MPs) shed from plateletes (PMPs), erythrocytes (EMPs) and leucocytes (LMPs). ResultsAnti-HLA class I/II antibodies or granulocyte-reactive anti-HLA antibodies were detected in 182% of blood components (RBC and FFP) transfused to TRALI and in 05% of FFP transfused to TAD cases. Cytokines and LysoPCs concentrations in blood components transfused to PTR patients did not exceed those in blood components transfused to patients with no PTR. Only EMPs percentage in RBCs transfused to patients with TRALI was significantly higher (P<005) than in RBCs transfused to patients with no PTR. ConclusionImmune character of PTR was confirmed mainly in 1/5 TRALI cases. Among non-immune factors, only MPs released from stored RBCs are suggested as potential mediators of TRALI. Our results require further observations in a more numerous and better defined group of patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据