4.2 Article

Blood group A(1) and A(2) revisited: an immunochemical analysis

期刊

VOX SANGUINIS
卷 96, 期 1, 页码 56-61

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2008.01112.x

关键词

ABO; glycolipids; immunochemical; monoclonal antibody; subgroups

资金

  1. Claes Hogman SAGMAN stipendium
  2. Baxter Medical AB, Sweden
  3. Swedish Medical Research Council [11612]
  4. AUT University
  5. KODE Biotech Ltd.
  6. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamemto de Pessoal de Nivel Superior, Brazil) [1542-03-6]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The basis of blood group A(1) and A(2) phenotypes has been debated for many decades, and still the chemical basis is unresolved. The literature generally identifies the glycolipid chemical differences between blood group A(1) and A(2) phenotypes as being poor or no expression of A type 3 and A type 4 structures on A(2) red cells, although this assertion is not unanimous. Using purified glycolipids and specific monoclonal antibodies, we revisited the glycolipid basis of the A(1) and A(2) phenotypes. Purified glycolipids were extracted from four individual A(1) and four individual A(2) blood units. One blood unit from an A weak subgroup was also included. Monoclonal anti-A reagents including those originally used to define the basis of A(1) and A(2) phenotypes were used in a thin layer chromatography - enzyme immunoassay to identify the presence of specific glycolipids. A type 3 glycolipid structures were found to be present in large amounts in all phenotypes. In contrast, the A type 4 glycolipid structure was virtually undetectable in the A(2) phenotype, but was present in the A(1) and A subgroup samples. The major glycolipid difference between the A(1) and A(2) phenotypes is the dominance of A type 4 glycolipids in the A(1) phenotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据