4.5 Article

The viral RNase Erns prevents IFN type-I triggering by pestiviral single- and double-stranded RNAs

期刊

VIRUS RESEARCH
卷 140, 期 1-2, 页码 15-23

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2008.10.015

关键词

Innate immunity; Bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV); Pestivirus; Viral RNA; RIG-I; Interferon (IFN) type-I

类别

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [3100A0-109597, 3200-068305]
  2. Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interferon (IFN) type-I is of utmost importance in the innate antiviral defence of eukaryotic cells. The cells express intra- and extracellular receptors that monitor their surroundings for the presence of viral genomes. Bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV), a Pestivirus of the family Flaviviridae, is able to prevent IFN synthesis induced by poly(IC), a synthetic dsRNA. The evasion of innate immunity might be a decisive ability of BVDV to establish persistent infection in its host. We report that ds- as well as ssRNA fragments of viral origin are able to trigger IFN synthesis, and that the viral envelope glycoprotein Erns, that is also secreted from infected cells, is able to inhibit IFN expression induced by these extracellular viral RNAs. The RNase activity of E-rns, is required for this inhibition, and E-rns degrades ds- and ssRNA at neutral pH. In addition, cells infected with a cytopathogenic strain of BVDV contain more dsRNA than cells infected with the homologous non-cytopathogenic strain, and the intracellular viral RNA was able to excite the IFN system in a 5'-triphosphate-, i.e. RIG-I-, independent manner. Functionally, Ems might represent a decoy receptor that binds and enzymatically degrades viral RNA that otherwise might activate the IFN defence by binding to Toll-like receptors of uninfected cells. Thus, the pestiviral RNase efficiently manipulates the host's self-nonself discrimination to Successfully establish and maintain persistence and immunotolerance. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据