4.5 Article

Development of cost-effective real-time PCR test: to detect a wide range of HBV DNA concentrations in the western amazon region of Brazil

期刊

VIROLOGY JOURNAL
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-11-16

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. IPEPATRO
  2. CEPEM
  3. Universidade Federal de Rondonia
  4. Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz- Rondonia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Currently there is a significant risk of infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) during blood transfusion in high epidemic area. This is due to the pre-seroconversion window period, immunovariant viral strains and the presence of occult HBV infection (OBI). The aim of this study was to develop an in-house real-time PCR-based method, which was both ultra-sensitive and efficient offering an alternative method for nucleic acid testing (NAT). Methods: A precore fragment with 109 bp was cloned and serial diluted to standard curve construction. The calibration of the HBV - DNA values was performed against OptiQuant (R) HBV-DNA Quantification Panel, Acrometrix Europe B.V.). Results: From our in-house plasmid we prepared serial dilutions ranging from 2 x 10(3) - 2 x 10(9) copies/ml. The threshold was adjusted automatically during analysis and the data collected were analyzed by linear regression (r(2) = 0.99). The limit of detection for the assay with pHBVRO standards was 2000/ml in a total reaction volume of 30 mu l. We found a strong correlation between the two methods (r(2) = 0.9965 and p < 0.0001). The regression line give us the following equation: Log 10 (IU/mL) = 0.9038Log 10 (copies/mL) - 1.0643, suggesting that 1 IU/mL = 15 copies/mL. Conclusions: Therefore, we can affirm that the qHBVRO PCR can detect HBV DNA in individuals with hepatitis B at any stage of the disease showing high capacity for NAT screening in hepatitis b donors. This results of sensitivity could provide an advance for automation in blood banks and increasing safety of patients who receive blood transfusions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据