4.5 Article

Analysis of hemagglutinin-mediated entry tropism of H5N1 avian influenza

期刊

VIROLOGY JOURNAL
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-6-39

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI 059570, CA 092459]
  2. University of Illinois at Chicago Fellowship
  3. Ministry of Science & Technology, China [2004BA519A29, 2005CB523001]
  4. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [30599434, 30525010]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30270308, 30599432]
  6. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2006CB910103, 2007CB914800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Avian influenza virus H5N1 is a major concern as a potential global pandemic. It is thought that multiple key events must take place before efficient human-to-human transmission of the virus occurs. The first step in overcoming host restriction is viral entry which is mediated by HA, responsible for both viral attachment and viral/host membrane fusion. HA binds to glycans-containing receptors with terminal sialic acid (SA). It has been shown that avian influenza viruses preferentially bind to alpha 2,3-linked SAs, while human influenza A viruses exhibit a preference for alpha 2,6-linked SAs. Thus it is believed the precise linkage of SAs on the target cells dictate host tropism of the viruses. Results: We demonstrate that H5N1 HA/HIV pseudovirus can efficiently transduce several human cell lines including human lung cells. Interestingly, using a lectin binding assay we show that the presence of both alpha 2,6-linked and alpha 2,3-linked SAs on the target cells does not always correlate with efficient transduction. Further, HA substitutions of the residues implicated in switching SA-binding between avian and human species did not drastically affect HA-mediated transduction of the target cells or target cell binding. Conclusion: Our results suggest that a host factor(s), which is yet to be identified, is required for H5N1 entry in the host cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据