4.4 Article

Epitopes for broad and potent neutralizing antibody responses during chronic infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1

期刊

VIROLOGY
卷 396, 期 2, 页码 339-348

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.10.044

关键词

HIV-1; Envelope glycoprotein; Neutralizing epitope; In vivo; Glycan; V3; CD4BS

类别

资金

  1. MAID Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology [A1067854]
  2. NIH [RO1 AI073133]
  3. Medical Research Council [G0200585] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0200585] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neutralizing antibody (nAb) response is sporadic and has limited potency and breadth during infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). In rare cases, broad and potent nAbs are actually induced in vivo. Identifying specific epitopes targeted by such broad and potent nAb response is valuable in guiding the design of a prophylactic vaccine aimed to induce nAb. In this study, we have defined neutralizing epitope usage in 7 out of 17 subjects with broad and potent nAbs by using targeted mutagenesis in known neutralizing epitopes of HIV-1 glycoproteins and by using in vitro depletion of serum neutralizing activity by various recombinant HIV-1 glycoproteins. Consistent with recent reports, the CD4 binding site (CD4BS) is targeted by nAbs in vivo (4 of the 7 subjects with defined neutralizing epitopes). The new finding from this study is that epitopes in the gp120 outer domain are also targeted by nAbs in vivo (5 of the 7 Subjects), The outer domain epitopes include glycan-dependent epitopes (2 Subjects), conserved nonlinear epitope in the V3 region (2 Subjects), and a CD4BS epitope composed mainly of the elements in the outer domain ( I subject). Importantly, we found indication for epitope poly-specificity, a dual usage of the V3 and CD4BS epitopes, in only one subject. This study provides a more complete profile of epitope usage for broad and potent nAb responses during HIV-1 infection. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据