4.2 Review

Immune therapy in autoimmune encephalitis: a systematic review

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 1391-1419

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1586/14737175.2015.1115720

关键词

Autoimmune encephalitis; antibodies to neuronal cell surface antigens; immune therapy; treatment; limbic encephalitis; NMDAR; LGI1; Caspr2; AMPAR

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)
  2. Petre Foundation (Australia)
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council
  4. MS Research Australia
  5. Star Scientific Foundation
  6. Pfizer Neuroscience
  7. Tourette Syndrome Association
  8. University of Sydney
  9. Biogen-Idec
  10. Bristol-Myers Squibb

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have reviewed the literature of immune therapy in autoimmune encephalitis associated with antibodies to cell surface antigens including N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR), leucine-rich, glioma-inactivated protein-1 (LGI1), contactin-associated protein-2 (Caspr2), the -amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR), -aminobutyric acid-A receptor (GABAAR), -aminobutyric acid-B receptor (GABABR), Glycine R and other rarer antigens. Most studies are retrospective cohorts, and there are no randomised controlled trials. Most clinicians use first-line therapy (steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange), and if severe or refractory, second-line therapy (rituximab, cyclophosphamide). When present, tumours should be removed. There are common therapeutic themes emerging. Firstly, patients given immune therapy do better and relapse less than patients given no treatment. Secondly, patients given early treatment do better. And thirdly, when patients fail first-line therapy, second-line therapy improves outcomes and reduces relapses. Given the retrospective uncontrolled data, the literature has inherent bias, including severity and reporting bias.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据