4.1 Article

The Alternative NF-κB Signalling Pathway is a Prerequisite for an Appropriate Immune Response Against Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Infection

期刊

VIRAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 295-308

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/vim.2009.0101

关键词

-

资金

  1. EUROFLU
  2. VIRGIL European Network of Excellence on Antiviral Drug Resistance [LSHMCT-2004-503359]
  3. Federal Government of Germany
  4. Bundesministerium Fur Bildung Und Forschung (BMBF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two major nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) signalling pathways are involved in the regulation of the immune response. While the classical NF-kappa B pathway is responsible for regulation of genes encoding components of the innate immune response, the alternative NF-kappa B signalling pathway mediates processes of the adaptive immune system. To evaluate the role of the NF-kappa B signalling pathways in the control of viral infection, we have used lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection of mice, which is known to be an excellent model for studying antiviral immune responses. Via the use of mice that were deficient in NF-kappa B subunits from either the classical (p50(-/-) mice) or the alternative NF-kappa B pathway (p52(-/-) mice), we were able to demonstrate that the alternative NF-kappa B pathway is required for the T-cell-mediated immune response against LCMV. Mice that were deficient in the alternative NF-kappa B pathway subunit p52 showed an impaired T-cell response against LCMV infection. Furthermore, these mice also showed an impaired T-cell-dependent humoral immune response against vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) infection. Adoptive transfer experiments revealed that impaired priming, but not the T-cell response itself, was responsible for the defective cellular immune response against LCMV infection. Our data demonstrate that a functional alternative NF-kappa B signalling pathway is required to assure an adequate immune response after viral infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据