4.7 Article

A quantitative assessment of primary and secondary immune responses in cattle using a B cell ELISPOT assay

期刊

VETERINARY RESEARCH
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/vetres:2008041

关键词

bovine immunology; memory B cells; plasma cells; humoral response; vaccines

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/B/00549]
  2. Institute for Animal Health
  3. BBSRC [BBS/E/I/00001432, BBS/E/I/00001447] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/I/00001447, BBS/E/I/00001296, BBS/E/I/00001432] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the study was to build a comprehensive picture of the appearance in the blood stream of Ag-specific plasma cells and memory B cells in the bovine model. For this purpose, we have developed a method allowing the detection and quantification of both cell types within individual calves immunised with ovalbumin. During the primary response, we detected a burst of ovalbumin-specific plasma cells at days 6 and 7 post-immunisation, which was followed by the production of specific Ab, whereas a gradual increase of memory B cells was only detected from day 15. As expected, a boost immunisation performed 7 weeks later induced a quicker and stronger secondary response. Indeed, a burst of plasma cells was detected in the blood at days 3 and 4, which was followed by a strong increase in Ab titres. Furthermore, a burst of memory B cells, and not a gradual increase, was detected at days 5 and 6 post-boost immunisation. Importantly, we showed a strong correlation between the anti-ovalbumin-specific IgG titres detected 5 months after secondary immunisation and the plasma cell numbers detected in the blood at the peak response after secondary immunisation. The detection and quantification of plasma cells following an immunisation/vaccination strategy could constitute a very effective means for predicting the magnitude and longevity of an Ab response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据