4.8 Article

Hippocampome.org: a knowledge base of neuron types in the rodent hippocampus

期刊

ELIFE
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.09960

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01NS39600]
  2. Office of Naval Research (ONR) [MURI N00014-10-1-0198]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR)
  4. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  5. Northrop Grumman
  6. Keck
  7. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1302125] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1302125] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  10. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1302256] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hippocampome.org is a comprehensive knowledge base of neuron types in the rodent hippocampal formation (dentate gyrus, CA3, CA2, CA1, subiculum, and entorhinal cortex). Although the hippocampal literature is remarkably information-rich, neuron properties are often reported with incompletely defined and notoriously inconsistent terminology, creating a formidable challenge for data integration. Our extensive literature mining and data reconciliation identified 122 neuron types based on neurotransmitter, axonal and dendritic patterns, synaptic specificity, electrophysiology, and molecular biomarkers. All similar to 3700 annotated properties are individually supported by specific evidence (similar to 14,000 pieces) in peer-reviewed publications. Systematic analysis of this unprecedented amount of machine-readable information reveals novel correlations among neuron types and properties, the potential connectivity of the full hippocampal circuitry, and outstanding knowledge gaps. User-friendly browsing and online querying of Hippocampome.org may aid design and interpretation of both experiments and simulations. This powerful, simple, and extensible neuron classification endeavor is unique in its detail, utility, and completeness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据