4.5 Article

Efficacy of a single high oxfendazole dose against gastrointestinal nematodes in naturally infected pigs

期刊

VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
卷 194, 期 1, 页码 70-74

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.01.003

关键词

Oxfendazole; Nematodicidal activity; Pigs

资金

  1. Department for International Development (DFID) UK
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF)
  3. GALVmed (Global Alliance for Veterinary Medicines)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The goal of the current experiment was to assess the clinical efficacy of oxfendazole (OFZ) administered as a single oral dose (30 mg/kg) to pigs naturally parasitized with Ascaris suum, Oesophagostomum spp., Metastrongylus spp. and Trichuris sins. Thirty-six local ecotype piglets were divided into three independent experiments, named I, II and III (n =12 each), respectively. Each experiment involved two different groups (n=6): Untreated Control and OFZ treated. Animals were naturally parasitized with A. suum (Experiments I, II and III), Oesophagostomum spp. (Experiments I and II), T. suis (Experiments II and III) and Metastrongylus spp. (Experiment I). Pigs in the treated group received OFZ (Synanthice, Merial Ltd., 9.06% suspension) orally at 30 mg/kg dose. At five (5) days post-treatment, animals were sacrificed and the clinical efficacy of the OFZ treatment was established following the currently available WAAVP guidelines for a controlled efficacy test. None of the animals involved in this experiment showed any adverse events during the study. OFZ treatment given as a single 30 mg/kg oral dose showed a 100% efficacy against all the nematode parasites present in the three experiments. In conclusion, under the current experimental conditions, OFZ orally administered to naturally parasitized piglets at a single dose of 30 mg/kg was safe and highly efficacious (100%) against adult stages of A. suum, Oesophagostomum spp., T. suis and Metastrongylus spp. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据