4.5 Article

A PCR-based survey of selected Babesia and Theileria parasites in cattle in Sri Lanka

期刊

VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
卷 190, 期 1-2, 页码 263-267

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.05.014

关键词

Babesia; Theileria; PCR; Sri Lanka; Cattle

资金

  1. program for the Promotion of Basic Research Activities for Innovative Biosciences (PROBRAIN)
  2. Global COE Program from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture and Technology
  3. Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS), Japan
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22380154, 23405041] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hemoprotozoan parasites are responsible for significant economic losses in cattle. We screened Sri Lankan cattle populations for the presence of Babesia bovis, Babesia bigemina, Theileria annulata, and Theileria orientalis, using species-specific PCR assays. Out of 316 samples collected from animals in four different districts of Sri Lanka (Nuwara Eliya, Polonnaruwa, Ampara, and Jaffna), 231 (73.1%) were positive for at least one parasite species. All four parasite species were detected among the study groups from all of the districts surveyed. The first and second commonest hemoprotozoan parasites identified were T. orientalis (53.5%) and B. bigemina (30.1%), respectively. We found that the dry zones (Polonnaruwa, Ampara, and Jaffna) had more Babesia-positive animals than the hill country wet zone (Nuwara Eliya). In contrast, T. orientalis was the predominant species detected in Nuwara Eliya, while infection with T. annulata was more common in the dry zones. In addition, 81 (35.1%) of the 231 positive samples were infected with more than one parasite species. The presence of multiple parasite species among the different cattle populations is of clinical and economic significance. Therefore, island-wide control and prevention programs against bovine babesiosis and theileriosis are needed to minimize the financial burden caused by these parasites. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据