4.5 Article

Recombinant S3Pvac-phage anticysticercosis vaccine: Simultaneous protection against cysticercosis and hydatid disease in rural pigs

期刊

VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
卷 176, 期 1, 页码 53-58

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.10.039

关键词

Filamentous phages; Vaccination; Cysticercosis; Hydatidosis; Taenia solium; Echinococcus granulosus

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia [185946]
  2. Fundacion Produce, Morelos A.C.
  3. Secretaria de Desarrollo Rural del Estado del Morelos, Mexico
  4. CEAMISH-Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Morelos
  5. LISIG-UAEM
  6. Municipal Authorities from Tlaquiltenango, Tepalcingo, and Ciudad Ayala, Morelos
  7. Xoxocotla and Direccion General de Personal Academico
  8. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico [IN-217908]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides macroscopic and histological evidence on the statistically significant protective effects of S3Pvac-phage vaccination against porcine cysticercosis and hydatidosis. The study included 391 rustically bred pigs (187 vaccinated and 204 controls). Vaccination significantly reduced the prevalence of cysticercosis by 61.7%. Vaccination also significantly reduced by 56.1% the prevalence of hydatidosis caused by Echinococcus granulosus in pigs. The presence of the vaccine epitopes in both cestodes is probably involved in the cross-protection observed. Increased inflammation was found in 5% of cysticerci recovered from controls, versus 24% from vaccinated pigs (P < 0.01). Hydatid cysts were non-inflammatory in either group. Vaccination was effective to prevent one single disease, but it failed to prevent the simultaneous infections with both parasites in a same pig. The widening of the S3Pvac-phage vaccine protective repertoire to include hydatidosis is a convenient feature that should reduce the prevalence of two frequent zoonoses that affect rustic porcine breading with a single action. Thus, the costs of two different vaccination programs would be reduced to a single one with significant reduction in both zoonoses. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据