4.5 Article

Different isolates from Leishmania braziliensis complex induce distinct histopathological features in a murine model of infection

期刊

VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
卷 165, 期 3-4, 页码 231-240

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.07.019

关键词

Leishmania braziliensis complex; Histopathology; Virulence; Pathogenesis; Inflammatory infiltrates; Megakaryocytes

资金

  1. FAPEMIG (Minas Gerais, Brazil)
  2. Sustainable Science Institute (SSI, USA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate the histopathological features in tissues of mice infected by human isolates (I, II, and III) or the reference M2903 strain of Leishmania braziliensis complex. BALB/c and C57Bl/6 mice were infected in the hind footpad with 10(6) stationary-phase promastigotes; of L braziliensis complex. The evolution of lesions was observed for 10 weeks and the animals were then euthanized and liver, spleen and popliteal lymph nodes were collected. Tissues were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and analyzed by immunohistochemistry assay. Increased thickness of infected footpads was observed in all animals, lesions were nodular and non-ulcerated. Mice infected with isolate I presented inflammatory infiltrates consisting predominantly of mononuclear cells in all tissues examined, and also a great number of megakaryocytes, compared with other isolates. Infection with isolate II led to an infected footpad enlargement not seen in other isolates. In addition, mononuclear infiltrates in the liver and hemosiderin in spleen were noted. Conversely. mice infected with either isolate III or M2903 strain only showed an increased number of megakaryocytes in spleen. All tissues examined had detectable amastigote forms of Leishmania by immunohistochemistry in all groups Taking together, our results showed an unforeseen behavior of different isolates of L. braziliensis complex that led to diverse pathological findings. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据