4.5 Article

The importance of terrestrial dispersal for connectivity among headwater salamander populations

期刊

ECOSPHERE
卷 6, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/ES15-00302.1

关键词

amphibians; Desmognathus fuscus; genetic population structure; movement; river networks; streams

类别

资金

  1. Towson University Faculty Development and Research Committee Grant
  2. Towson University Graduate Student Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many organisms are primarily constrained to the channels of the upstream terminus of river networks with limited capacities for both in-stream and overland dispersal. Dispersal is believed to contribute to gene flow and the demographic stability of headwater populations. While assumed, the importance of overland dispersal to gene flow is largely unexplored in headwater salamanders. Six microsatellite markers were used to assess patterns of genetic population structure for a headwater salamander, Desmognathus fuscus. Tissue samples were collected using a nested hierarchical study design, which specifically addressed the contribution of overland movements to the genetic connectivity of headwater populations. Genetic divergence was significant among all populations (F-st = 0.027-0.405) and at all hierarchical spatial scales. However, lower degrees of genetic population structure were observed among proximal streams that shared no downstream hydrologic connections. Mantel tests indicated a significant relationship between genetic divergence and overland distance, suggesting that D. fuscus populations conform to an isolation-by-distance model of gene flow. Estimated dispersal among headwater streams was limited, with an average of less than one effective migrant per generation moving between paired headwater streams. These results indicate that regional patterns of genetic population structure are influenced by overland dispersal and suggest the importance of terrestrial movements in maintaining population connectivity among D. fuscus populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据